<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Michael Richard Murphy</title>
	<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com</link>
	<description>Exploring and promoting web standards</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee Anti-Phishing filter for Internet Explorer causes onclick events to not fire? by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2008/03/21/mcafee-anti-phishing-filter-for-internet-explorer-causes-onclick-events-to-not-fire/#comment-21756</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 00:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2008/03/21/mcafee-anti-phishing-filter-for-internet-explorer-causes-onclick-events-to-not-fire/#comment-21756</guid>
		<description>@Nick,

Interesting. No, I don't have any documentation about the upcoming fix. I'll email you info for my contact at McAfee and maybe he can help you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nick,</p>
<p>Interesting. No, I don&#8217;t have any documentation about the upcoming fix. I&#8217;ll email you info for my contact at McAfee and maybe he can help you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee Anti-Phishing filter for Internet Explorer causes onclick events to not fire? by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2008/03/21/mcafee-anti-phishing-filter-for-internet-explorer-causes-onclick-events-to-not-fire/#comment-21473</link>
		<author>Nick</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 20:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2008/03/21/mcafee-anti-phishing-filter-for-internet-explorer-causes-onclick-events-to-not-fire/#comment-21473</guid>
		<description>I have experienced a very similar problem recently on a web application for my company.  We have some form fields that have an onKeyPress event handler associated with them.  They are either formatting a dollar amount or a date, but in both cases they are monitoring the key press event and doing some formatting.  

The problem we're seeing is that numbers typed into these fields are being duplicated.  For instance, when a 2 is typed it appears as 22.  So far only three people have reported this problem. Two of them confirmed that disabling the McAfee anti-phishing filter stopped the double-digits.

Do you have a link to any documentation on the upcoming fix?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have experienced a very similar problem recently on a web application for my company.  We have some form fields that have an onKeyPress event handler associated with them.  They are either formatting a dollar amount or a date, but in both cases they are monitoring the key press event and doing some formatting.  </p>
<p>The problem we&#8217;re seeing is that numbers typed into these fields are being duplicated.  For instance, when a 2 is typed it appears as 22.  So far only three people have reported this problem. Two of them confirmed that disabling the McAfee anti-phishing filter stopped the double-digits.</p>
<p>Do you have a link to any documentation on the upcoming fix?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee Anti-Phishing filter for Internet Explorer causes onclick events to not fire? by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2008/03/21/mcafee-anti-phishing-filter-for-internet-explorer-causes-onclick-events-to-not-fire/#comment-18880</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2008/03/21/mcafee-anti-phishing-filter-for-internet-explorer-causes-onclick-events-to-not-fire/#comment-18880</guid>
		<description>Al,

Sorry for the delay. With so much spam, occassionally legit comments get overlooked.

I'm glad to hear from you. I've posted this issue in a handful of forums but haven't run into anybody experiencing the same problems. I haven't turned up anything at MSDN or the McAfee site either.

We were able to verify from one of our customers that new Dell laptops are shipping with McAfee by default. Yikes!

The good news is that I did report this finding to McAfee (with some examples of failing sites) and they do plan a patch to be released sometime during summer 2008. Until then he recommends the javascript:void(0) fix that we're using. Not sure how that will work with the problems you're describing.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al,</p>
<p>Sorry for the delay. With so much spam, occassionally legit comments get overlooked.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to hear from you. I&#8217;ve posted this issue in a handful of forums but haven&#8217;t run into anybody experiencing the same problems. I haven&#8217;t turned up anything at MSDN or the McAfee site either.</p>
<p>We were able to verify from one of our customers that new Dell laptops are shipping with McAfee by default. Yikes!</p>
<p>The good news is that I did report this finding to McAfee (with some examples of failing sites) and they do plan a patch to be released sometime during summer 2008. Until then he recommends the javascript:void(0) fix that we&#8217;re using. Not sure how that will work with the problems you&#8217;re describing.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on McAfee Anti-Phishing filter for Internet Explorer causes onclick events to not fire? by Al Sparber</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2008/03/21/mcafee-anti-phishing-filter-for-internet-explorer-causes-onclick-events-to-not-fire/#comment-18069</link>
		<author>Al Sparber</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 05:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2008/03/21/mcafee-anti-phishing-filter-for-internet-explorer-causes-onclick-events-to-not-fire/#comment-18069</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

It's not just links with explicit onclick events. Excrutiatingly correct DOM scripting techniques that programatically assign click events also fail in the same way with MacAfee phishing filter. Consider this link that fails:

"&lt;a href="p7ssm_img_3/fullsize/ab112_fs.jpg" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;"

A user with MacAfee will see the HREF executed, which in this case opens an image, even though a script is dynamically assigning an onclick. MacAfee is doing its deed at a much deeper level than you might think. THe above link is taken from an image slide show application that we market and a good number of folks are reporting failures - all being traced to MacAfee's filter. Here is the actual page:

http://www.projectseven.com/products/galleries/ssm/ssm_03.htm


What's scary is that it looks like Dell is installing this filter on its new computers.

If you here from MacAfee, please let us know. We will do the same.

-- 
Al Sparbner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not just links with explicit onclick events. Excrutiatingly correct DOM scripting techniques that programatically assign click events also fail in the same way with MacAfee phishing filter. Consider this link that fails:</p>
<p>&#8220;<a href="p7ssm_img_3/fullsize/ab112_fs.jpg" rel="nofollow"></a>&#8221;</p>
<p>A user with MacAfee will see the HREF executed, which in this case opens an image, even though a script is dynamically assigning an onclick. MacAfee is doing its deed at a much deeper level than you might think. THe above link is taken from an image slide show application that we market and a good number of folks are reporting failures - all being traced to MacAfee&#8217;s filter. Here is the actual page:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.projectseven.com/products/galleries/ssm/ssm_03.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.projectseven.com/products/galleries/ssm/ssm_03.htm</a></p>
<p>What&#8217;s scary is that it looks like Dell is installing this filter on its new computers.</p>
<p>If you here from MacAfee, please let us know. We will do the same.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
Al Sparbner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Work work work&#8230; by Kevan</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/11/09/work-work-work/#comment-10719</link>
		<author>Kevan</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 17:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/11/09/work-work-work/#comment-10719</guid>
		<description>Was' up dude? Thanks for the vmail, I will call you to catch up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was&#8217; up dude? Thanks for the vmail, I will call you to catch up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;New&#8221; by What&#8217;s New With Me&#8230; at Michael Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/08/23/the-new-2/#comment-10103</link>
		<author>What&#8217;s New With Me&#8230; at Michael Richard Murphy</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/08/23/the-new-2/#comment-10103</guid>
		<description>[...] I summed up the latest changes to this site in another post so I won&#8217;t go into it again now. The newest of the new though is the LinkedIn icon that appears at the top of the middle column. I&#8217;ve always gotten good traffic and leads from my LinkedIn profile. Now that I&#8217;m left to my own devices for employment, I&#8217;m going to try to better leverage LinkedIn. Afterall, there&#8217;s a wealth of good information there about me. It acts as a resume of sorts, outlining my work experience. Even better, it contains loads of endorsements and recommendations from my coworkers and clients. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I summed up the latest changes to this site in another post so I won&#8217;t go into it again now. The newest of the new though is the LinkedIn icon that appears at the top of the middle column. I&#8217;ve always gotten good traffic and leads from my LinkedIn profile. Now that I&#8217;m left to my own devices for employment, I&#8217;m going to try to better leverage LinkedIn. Afterall, there&#8217;s a wealth of good information there about me. It acts as a resume of sorts, outlining my work experience. Even better, it contains loads of endorsements and recommendations from my coworkers and clients. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The &#8220;New&#8221; by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/08/23/the-new-2/#comment-9576</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/08/23/the-new-2/#comment-9576</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike, the site looks great. How can I contact you now that you're in Oregon? Email me if you can. Got a question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike, the site looks great. How can I contact you now that you&#8217;re in Oregon? Email me if you can. Got a question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Coming&#8230;soon (?) by The &#8220;New&#8221; at Michael Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/08/11/comingsoon/#comment-9574</link>
		<author>The &#8220;New&#8221; at Michael Richard Murphy</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/08/11/comingsoon/#comment-9574</guid>
		<description>[...] I mentioned in my previous post, Coming&#8230;soon(?), this website also has a new home with bluehost. They came highly recommended and they offer RoR [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I mentioned in my previous post, Coming&#8230;soon(?), this website also has a new home with bluehost. They came highly recommended and they offer RoR [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OMG&#8230;the music! by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/06/28/omgthe-music/#comment-9557</link>
		<author>Michael</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 16:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/06/28/omgthe-music/#comment-9557</guid>
		<description>Good call on the converter. The best $10 I ever spent. No more fiddling with tuning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call on the converter. The best $10 I ever spent. No more fiddling with tuning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on OMG&#8230;the music! by Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/06/28/omgthe-music/#comment-9335</link>
		<author>Clark</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.letsgomurphys.com/2007/06/28/omgthe-music/#comment-9335</guid>
		<description>I use the tape converter for my Ipod.  It avoids the hassles with FM tuning. The converters are like $5 at goodwill or $10 at Radio Shack.  Many new head units have 1/8th inputs so you can just plug your ipod directly in.  They run about $50-$100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use the tape converter for my Ipod.  It avoids the hassles with FM tuning. The converters are like $5 at goodwill or $10 at Radio Shack.  Many new head units have 1/8th inputs so you can just plug your ipod directly in.  They run about $50-$100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
